REFUTING THE DOCTRINE OF
CONDITIONAL SECURITY
A dangerous and unscriptural teaching that affects many aspects of Christian life.
 

Preface

Often I think of the Apostle Jude, who set about to write the account of the gospel story, but at length was constrained by the Holy Ghost to “write unto you, and exhort you that ye should earnestly contend for the faith which was once delivered unto the saints.” While warnings and exhortations were not Jude’s preferred conversion, yet the seriousness of the apostate infiltrators caused him to write about something different. In conversations with a young man several years ago, I was troubled about a doctrine that he held and also began teaching others.  I understand this teaching to be entirely unscriptural, and – in all honesty – a false doctrine. The point of difference with the young man awakened me to see the seriousness of this particular error. I wrote to him from the standpoint that his difficulty was a result of ignorance rather than intentional indifference.
“Ye did run well; who did hinder you that ye should not obey the truth?  This persuasion cometh not of him that calleth you.” Galatians 5:7-9
This young man challenged me to point out which verses support the doctrine of eternal security, and insinuated that every defense he had heard was “an excuse to justify not believing the Bible.” The following paragraphs were written to as a whole-hearted (though feeble) attempt to point out the context and interpretation of the passages of scripture which he used to support the false doctrine of conditional security, and then to give a simple presentation of eternal security.
 
In the process of dialogging with the young man, and in responding to him, I realized what I believe is the underlying error behind this teaching: namely, that man wants to take some of the credit for his own salvation. This was a helpful realization for me as a young Christian, and it has served a a helpful principle in discerning other forms of error.
 
Following first, is a list of several texts of scripture (most of which the young man referred me to) which I believe were twisted out of context and woven together to form a foundation of a false doctrine. Below each passage is a (in some cases lengthy) description of what I understand to be the context of the passages and the interpretation – to the best of my understanding at the time, granted that I had and still have much to learn. After that, a summary of several scriptural principles, the lack of which I feel is the source of many falling into this error. In closing are a few remarks about substituting supernatural experiences for the Word of God, and then a summary of the implications of this false doctrine. I trust that, in writing, I was motivated by love for my peer.
 
In this article I refer to the two positions as: the doctrine of “Eternal Security” and the doctrine of “Conditional Security”.
 
  

Texts Which “Seem” to Support Conditional Security

The following passages have been used by those who hold conditional security to support their doctrine. In many cases, if you read these passages out of context, you could take the wrong idea. But a careful look at the context of each passage will make the meaning plain.

Passages from the Epistle to the Hebrews

Before we begin to look at several texts from the Epistle to the Hebrews we should understand the context of the epistle. This epistle does not address assembly or church doctrine (the church is only mentioned once, in Chapter 12, and at that, only in passing), nor does it entertain the thought of the Body of Christ. This book is written to a mixture of saved and unsaved Jewish people. It completely passes over the subject of the church, although it is very applicable to us. It is written as a call to Jews to “go forth therefore unto him without the camp” (Hebrews 13:13) leaving the Jewish system. The writer does this by presenting Christ as the mediator of a new covenant, by showing the reader the contrast between the Jewish economy and the “better things” that God had in store for them, by revealing the object of all the Old Testament pictures and shadows (Christ), by telling them of the heavenly calling that had displaced their old earthly calling, and by stern warnings to those Jews who would refuse to leave the system and come onto Christian ground. This epistle was written shortly before the destruction of Jerusalem – the center of the Jewish system – by the Roman general Titus who burned the city and killed all those who did not flee. So we see, right from the beginning, that the warning “how shall we escape if we neglect so great salvation?” (Hebrews 2:3) was a sobering reality. Most of the confusion with this book is not understanding to whom this book was written, and the Spirit’s purpose in writing.

Hebrews 6:4-6

“For it is impossible for those who were once enlightened, and have tasted of the heavenly gift, and were made partakers of the Holy Ghost, And have tasted the good word of God, and the powers of the world to come, If they shall fall away, to renew them again unto repentance; seeing they crucify to themselves the Son of God afresh, and put him to an open shame.”
This is referring to an unbeliever who has seen the way of salvation and the benefits of salvation. They have conversed with others who had the life of Christ within them. They have even partaken in the operations of the Holy Ghost (probably an unbeliever who was attending a local assembly – Paul spoke of the assembly in Corinth; “…God is in you of a truth…”(1 Corinthians 14:25) – or like Balaam who spoke by inspiration of the Holy Ghost in Numbers 24:15-17 even though he was unregenerate). Lastly, they have tasted of the good Word of God (felt the impact of the Word on consciences with power – like Simon Magus in Acts 8) and the powers of the world to come – that is, a foretaste of millennial power that was given to the apostles near the birthday of the Church, which was displayed in miracles, tongues, and mighty acts of power. On that unbeliever, God has poured out the treasures of heaven for the benefit of his soul, and yet he has rejected His greatest gift, His Son! In effect he has “crucified to himself the Son of God afresh, and put Him to an open shame.” God gave him everything he could give, and it was all rejected. Therefore, once it becomes evident that he was never real (“if he shall fall away”), God says, “it is impossible to renew him again unto repentance” because it is clear that he doesn’t want what God is offering. This is amplified at the end of the epistle in the climactic chapter twelve, where we get it presented even more clearly (although even that text has been twisted by some to support Conditional Security). The “falling away” is not from justification, but from the profession of Christianity. This passage is speaking of an apostate, whose eternal fate is sealed through rejecting the gift of God.

Hebrews 10:19-31

“For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins, But a certain fearful looking for of judgment and fiery indignation, which shall devour the adversaries. He that despised Moses’ law died without mercy under two or three witnesses: Of how much sorer punishment, suppose ye, shall he be thought worthy, who hath trodden under foot the Son of God, and hath counted the blood of the covenant, wherewith he was sanctified, an unholy thing, and hath done despite unto the Spirit of grace? For we know him that hath said, Vengeance belongeth unto me, I will recompense, saith the Lord. And again, The Lord shall judge his people. It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God.”
This passage is probably the most difficult to understand, but once again, you have to keep in mind the context. First, we must read what is found previously (read Hebrews 10:1-18). In the Jewish economy, thousands upon thousands of sacrifices were “offered year by year”, and they could never “make the comers thereunto perfect.” But Jesus Christ “offered one sacrifice for sins forever” and now “there is no more offering for sins” because there is no more need, Christ has done it all. In the Jewish economy, if an individual sinned, he would make an offering for that sin. If he sinned that same sin again, he would simply make another offering. But if “we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth”, in other words, if we reject this offering, we cannot just make another offering. There is only one offering, and only one way into the holiest… by the blood of Jesus. The most difficult part is where it says “the blood of the covenant, wherewith he was sanctified”. How can someone who is sanctified lose their salvation? Sanctification simply means “to be set apart for a holy purpose.” But there is internal sanctification and there is external. When it says “he hath perfected forever them that are sanctified” it is internal sanctification… cleansed from sins – it is forever. The “blood of the covenant” was sprinkled in Exodus when the Law was given, and it set Israel apart as under the obligation to obey God’s Law. Therefore, this “sanctified” is external sanctification… it doesn’t reflect whether there was ever believing faith or not. This is a warning to the Jewish people not to treat this offering lightly, and not to reject this “better thing” that God was now speaking in these “last days” in the Person of His Son. Once again, it is a warning not to reject the work of Christ as the eternal sacrifice. This passage is not saying that a true believer can do something to lose their Eternal Security.

Hebrews 12:12-17 

“Wherefore lift up the hands which hang down, and the feeble knees; And make straight paths for your feet, lest that which is lame be turned out of the way; but let it rather be healed. Follow peace with all men, and holiness, without which no man shall see the Lord: Looking diligently lest any man fail of the grace of God; lest any root of bitterness springing up trouble you, and thereby many be defiled; Lest there be any fornicator, or profane person, as Esau, who for one morsel of meat sold his birthright. For ye know how that afterward, when he would have inherited the blessing, he was rejected: for he found no place of repentance, though he sought it carefully with tears.”
This portion is probably the most “seemingly” supportive of Conditional Security; although, the true meaning is easier to discern. In order to understand this passage one must remember the context. “…Holiness, without which no man shall see the Lord” is a statement of fact – no unholy person will enjoy the presence of a holy God. That does not mean that if you slip or become lukewarm, you will lose your salvation. This particular verse does not tell us how we can become holy, that comes only by faith, “not by works, lest any man should boast”. Next come exhortations and warnings. First, “Looking diligently lest any man fall from [or, lack of]the grace of God”. This is a different thought than Galatians 5:4. The writer is saying, look around and see if there is any soul who lacks grace (carrying on in a legal way), and warn them. And if you don’t, a “root of bitterness” will spring up, and many will be defiled. Specifically, this is talking about one who is clinging to Judaism. Ironically, this verse, which many use to support conditional security, is actually talking about someone like themselves, who “lacks of the grace of God” because they have chosen to live in a legal way.
 
However, it is the next part that people tend to twist. “Lest there be any fornicator, or profane person, as Esau, who for one morsel of meat sold his birthright.” A profane person is one who makes light of or defiles something that is very precious to God. In Ezek. 44:23 the “holy and profane” are contrasted as opposites. Esau took the greatest blessing that he had (precious to God), and traded it away for almost nothing. This is an exhortation to the Jewish audience not to sell the heavenly calling (their birthright) for the earthly Jewish system (one morsel of meat). If they rejected this message of grace from the Son of God, they would miss out on all the blessing. “Ye know how that afterward, when he would have inherited the blessing, he was rejected: for he found no place of repentance, though he sought it carefully with tears.” Note that Esau sought the blessing, but there was no place in his wicked heart for repentance. The rest of the chapter goes on to explain; “For ye [this gives us the key that he is speaking to the Jewish people] are not come unto the mount that might be touched, and that burned with fire, nor unto blackness, and darkness, and tempest…But ye are come unto mount Sion, and unto the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem, and to an innumerable company of angels, To the general assembly and church of the firstborn, which are written in heaven…” That is, Mount Sion has been presented to you, the covenant of grace with all its heavenly blessings – don’t reject it for the Mount Sinai that burns with fire, which, if you were to touch it, you would have to die. This is the culminating statement: “See that ye refuse not him that speaketh. For if they escaped not who refused him that spake on earth, much more shall not we escape, if we turn away from him that speaketh from heaven.” If you reject this wonderful gospel, all that will be left for you are the fires of God’s Judgment. So, we get the final warning – “For our God is a consuming fire.”
 
To me it is very clear that the answer to v.15, “looking diligently lest any man lack of the grace of God”, is in v.28 which says “wherefore we receiving a kingdom which cannot be moved, let us have grace, whereby we may serve God acceptably with reverence and godly fear”.

Passages from the Epistle of James

The epistle of James was written to the twelve tribes of Israel. Like Hebrews, this epistle definitely does not discuss church truth. But, unlike the Epistle to the Hebrews, James does not call to the Jewish believers to leave the Jewish system. Instead it is written to people just like those at the time of our Lord’s ministry. They knew the basic truths of Christianity, but nothing close to Ephesian truth. They knew of the Lord’s coming (as in John 14) but not in all its details (as in 1 Thessalonians 4). The believers knew that Jesus was the Christ, and professed His name, but at the same time would keep the law and the ordinances. See Acts 21:18-24, where you can read about James saying that Christians ought to be saved, but also to walk orderly and keep the law. This epistle does not explain redemption, or our spiritual blessings. Instead, James focuses on the display of the life of Christ in our practical walk – what others see.

The danger that James addressed was, if these Jewish Christians had not yet externally separated from unbelieving Jews, there might be a great deal of cross-over of the old, fleshly Jewish practices that are unbecoming for a Christian. James asks the question; what marks you believers out as different? The answer is: the works that are a result of faith. The only way that the reality of their conversion would be manifest to the world was if there was the practical outworking of new life in their lives by works. They would prove their faith by their works.
 
If you meet a man on the street who claims to be British, but his accent is German, how can you believe his profession? His claim is dead, so long as he cannot prove his citizenship. That does not mean that he is definitely not British; however, what it does show is that as far the evidence may demonstrate, the profession is false. Without works to go with our profession of faith, it is essentially dead, as far as the eye can see. Justification in Romans is how we are justified before God; justification in James is how we are justified before others.

James 2:14-24

“What doth it profit, my brethren, though a man say he hath faith, and have not works? can faith save him? If a brother or sister be naked, and destitute of daily food, And one of you say unto them, Depart in peace, be ye warmed and filled; notwithstanding ye give them not those things which are needful to the body; what doth it profit? Even so faith, if it hath not works, is dead, being alone. Yea, a man may say, Thou hast faith, and I have works: shew me thy faith without thy works, and I will shew thee my faith by my works. Thou believest that there is one God; thou doest well: the devils also believe, and tremble. But wilt thou know, O vain man, that faith without works is dead? Was not Abraham our father justified by works, when he had offered Isaac his son upon the altar? Seest thou how faith wrought with his works, and by works was faith made perfect? And the scripture was fulfilled which saith, Abraham believed God, and it was imputed unto him for righteousness: and he was called the Friend of God. Ye see then how that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only.”
As mentioned by way of introduction, this passage brings that, to the world, a profession of faith without works is dead, practically speaking. The book of James does not present the way that we are justified to God, but only how this world will know. It is of interest to note that Paul quoted the same verse (Genesis 15:6) in Romans to make the point that justification before God is only by faith. He used it again in Galatians for the same purpose. But James brings out how that the faith that Abraham had “wrought with his works” to prove outwardly that his faith was real. This passage does not infer that salvation is gained or upheld in any way by works.

Passages from the Epistles of Peter

The epistles of Peter were written to Jewish believers, as opposed to James which was written to “the twelve tribes”, or Hebrews which was written to a mixture of believing and unbelieving Jewish people.

1 Peter 4:17

“For the time is come that judgment must begin at the house of God: and if it first begin at us, what shall the end be of them that obey not the gospel of God?”
Supporters of conditional security take this verse to mean that believers are going to come under the judgement of God, in the sense of eternal damnation. First, the term “house of God” may refer to slightly different aspects in scripture, but always it has the thought of the public testimony of believers. I believe in this verse it is speaking about true believers. We are getting a principle that God always begins to judge at His own house. For example, if I had children, and my children were involved in some mischief with my neighbor’s children, would I reprimand my neighbor’s children before I reprimanded my own? Of course not. Neither will God. In the book of Revelation, we find that one half of the way through the seven-year tribulation God will judge His house – that is, the false professors alive at that time. After the false church has been dealt with, God will allow the world to follow after a man called “the Beast” (the leader of the revived Roman Empire) and his spiritual accomplice the “False Prophet” (or Anti-Christ) head on into judgment under the sword of none other than Jesus Christ Himself. In that way judgment will begin at the house of God, and afterward will continue to the rest of the world. However, this passage in 1 Peter refers to the way God holds true believers responsible live uprightly. He will judge His people through allowing sickness, death, and division – even to the point of a local assembly’s extinction – because of His perfect, just character. The “judgment” here does not mean eternal damnation. This is easily seen by the distinction made between the “house of God” and the “ungodly and sinner”. Peter is saying, if God is faithful enough to judge those who profess His name, then what a terrible fate awaits those who refuse the gospel!

2 Peter 2:1

“But there were false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction.” 
Supporters of conditional security say this verse proves that the Lord saved certain ones, but because they became false teachers they lost their salvation, and therefore bring destruction upon themselves. First, note that the critical translations have the word ‘Lord’ changed to ‘master’. The simile that is being used in this verse is that of a rebellious servant who disobeys and disowns his master. The emphasis is not on the purchase of the individual, but on their disobedience to authority.
 
Also, the Spirit of God carefully distinguishes between two great truths: purchase and redemption. To purchase a slave would be to buy them. To redeem a slave would be to buy them and set them free. For true believers, both things are true; we are purchased and we are redeemed. The classic example is the treasure hid in the field (Matthew 13). The Lord Jesus bought the entire field. Previously, the field had been defined; “the field is this world.” The entire world was purchased by Christ, including both believers and unbelievers in it. He owns them all in the sense that He has rights over them. But scripture never says unbelievers were redeemed… because they are still in bondage, slaves in their sins. These are false teachers who were never true believers.

2 Peter 2:20-21

“For if after they have escaped the pollutions of the world through the knowledge of the Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, they are again entangled therein, and overcome, the latter end is worse with them than the beginning. For it had been better for them not to have known the way of righteousness, than, after they have known it, to turn from the holy commandment delivered unto them.”
Supporters of conditional security say this verse shows that it is possible to know the Lord Jesus as Savior, and then to be entangled with the things of the world and thus lose one’s salvation. What this verse is speaking of are those who have practically escaped the “pollutions of the world” through association with other Christians; partaking at Christian love-feasts, going to the assembly meetings, and carrying on with a profession. But they are not real, and God will judge them as more responsible, because they were on the threshold – even tasting the benefits of Christianity – but they had no love for Christ. Notice that the passage goes on to say that these ones “had known the way of righteousness” but “turned from it.” This makes it abundantly clear that these men are apostates; they made a profession, but never knew the Lord in a personal way, and eventually fell away.
 
~~~~~~~
 
At this point it would be profitable to reflect on the passages we have previously mentioned. A large number of the verses that “seem” to support Conditional Security are found in the Jewish epistles (Hebrews, James, and first and second Peter). This is quite obviously due to incorrect assumptions about the context of the verses in the Jewish epistles, or the subjects of these epistles in general. However, we should briefly touch on several verses from the general (not specifically Jewish) epistles that I believe are also misunderstood in the context of the chapters where they are found. In every case, context is critical.

Passages from the Epistles of Paul

1 Corinthians 9:24-27

“Know ye not that they which run in a race run all, but one receiveth the prize? So run, that ye may obtain. And every man that striveth for the mastery is temperate in all things. Now they do it to obtain a corruptible crown; but we an incorruptible. I therefore so run, not as uncertainly; so fight I, not as one that beateth the air: But I keep under my body, and bring it into subjection: lest that by any means, when I have preached to others, I myself should be a castaway.”
The “troubling” part of this passage is the last sentence: “lest that by any means… I myself should be a castaway.” Some people try to deny that that word castaway means someone who goes to the lake of fire. Clearly, that is not the case. A castaway is someone who God casts away. What supporters of conditional security misunderstand here is not the definition of what a castaway is, but the way Paul is writing. What the Apostle is saying is, he is not only a professing believer, but he is practically living out his faith like a believer. If he only preached, he might be cast away as well as any unsaved person. He was: “walking the walk as well as talking the talk.” This is not saying that Paul was in doubt of his Eternal Security, but rather that he was using himself as the “guinea pig” in his warning. He was speaking to those who talked like Christians but were not living like true children of God.
 
Note: We speak in this way quite often. It is a way of being less pointed with an exhortation… you exhort yourself and effectively exhort the listeners. We get this principle in 1 Corinthians 4:6 “And these things, brethren, I have in a figure transferred to myself and to Apollos for your sakes; that ye might learn in us not to think of men above that which is written, that no one of you be puffed up for one against another.” This verse confirms that in Chapter 1 the Corinthians were not actually saying “I of Paul, and I of Apollos”, but they had leaders in the sects among them, whose names Paul was not even willing to mention, lest he add to their reputation. This makes sense because we know that the Corinthians doubted Paul’s Apostleship, and he had to defend it: “Am I am not an apostle? am I not free? have I not seen Jesus Christ our Lord? are not ye my work in the Lord? If I be not an apostle unto others, yet doubtless I am to you: for the seal of mine apostleship are ye in the Lord. Mine answer to them that do examine me is this…” (1 Corinthians 9:1-3).

Galatians 5:4

“Christ is become of no effect unto you, whosoever of you are justified by the law; ye are fallen from grace.”
The passage will be taken up in depth at the conclusion of this letter. It refers to a believer that has ceased to live by the principle of grace (a higher principle that rests on the sovereign grace of God for righteousness) and has begun to live by the principle of law (the principle of works as an effort to be acceptable to God – a lower principle). They have “fallen” from the principle of grace down to the principle of law; a “foolish” thing, Paul says in Chapter 3. Ironically, this verse – though used by them to say the opposite – actually condemns supporters of Conditional Security who hold that it is a Christian’s obligation to maintain their salvation. It is the very same “principle of law” that Paul warns about.

Philippians 3:12-13

“Wherefore, my beloved, as ye have always obeyed, not as in my presence only, but now much more in my absence, work out your own salvation with fear and trembling. For it is God which worketh in you both to will and to do of his good pleasure.”
This verse is often stumbled over, although there is really no need. “Your own salvation” refers to the effort that the Philippians were going to have to make for their preservation now that Paul was no longer with them to make that effort. It is in contrast to the salvation that Paul worked out for them when he was there. Once the context is understood, it becomes instantly clear what the “salvation” is speaking of. It refers to the salvation of the assembly, which was in danger of being ripped apart by their bickering among themselves and through persuasion from the enemy.
 
Paul’s view of a healthy Philippian assembly can be found in Philippians 1:27. The only way that the assembly would be saved was if they took heed to the exhortation in Chapter 2; “Let this mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus: Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God: But made himself of no reputation, etc.” Philippians 2:4-6. Once again, this passage (Ch. 3:12-13) is not referring to a loss of Eternal Security or to the idea that one could lose their salvation.

1 Timothy 1:18-20

“This charge I commit unto thee, son Timothy, according to the prophecies which went before on thee, that thou by them mightest war a good warfare; Holding faith, and a good conscience; which some having put away concerning faith have made shipwreck: Of whom is Hymenaeus and Alexander; whom I have delivered unto Satan, that they may learn not to blaspheme.”
This is a case where the Apostle Paul has excommunicated these two from the assembly so that they might endure the discipline of God at the hands of Satan himself. This is similar to the instance in 1 Corinthians 5 where Paul had judged from a distance that the fornicator was a wicked person and needed to be excommunicated: “In the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, when ye are gathered together, and my spirit, with the power of our Lord Jesus Christ, To deliver such an one unto Satan for the destruction of the flesh, that the spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus.” There was a chance that the person would be saved if they were put out. The man professed to be a Christian – but he was acting like an unsaved person. Being exposed to Satan’s sphere of influence (outside the assembly) would cause the breakdown of his body (sickness, etc.) and the Apostle hoped that this would turn him to the Lord before he died. In the same way, Hymenaeus and Alexander were being disciplined by God for blaspheming. These two had professed to be Christians, but whose practical lives were literally shipwrecked. We are left to conclude (to the extent that the evidence indicates) that they were never truly saved.

1 Timothy 4:1

“Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils.”
Supporters of conditional security say this verse refers to true believers departing from the faith, and thus losing their salvation. I insist that these would be professing Christians who apostatize – or prove themselves to have never been truly born again. This verse refers to the great apostasy that began in Paul’s lifetime, and is growing rapidly in the world around us. In a future day, after the church has been raptured, the great apostasy will mushroom into a huge movement, at the head of which will be the False Prophet, the Man of Sin, the Antichrist himself… whom the Lord shall destroy with the spirit of His mouth.

1 Timothy 4:16

“Take heed unto thyself, and unto the doctrine; continue in them: for in doing this thou shalt both save thyself, and them that hear thee.”
Supporters of conditional security say that this verse shows that in order for Timothy to maintain his eternal salvation he had to be very careful about his walk and doctrine. One look at the context of the passage will show that it is not talking about eternal salvation, but temporal salvation. Being “saved” here is to be saved from a wasted life of either foolishness or progress in the school of natural philosophy. The Word of God tells us what we need to do to “save ourselves” in more than one way. But we need to remember that we can have a saved soul, but a lost life.

2 Timothy 2:16-18

“But shun profane and vain babblings: for they will increase unto more ungodliness. And their word will eat as doth a canker: of whom is Hymenaeus and Philetus; Who concerning the truth have erred, saying that the resurrection is past already; and overthrow the faith of some.”
Supporters of conditional security say this verse shows that it is possible for someone to lose their salvation because it says their faith was overthrown. Here were two individuals – false teachers – that brought a message which was deeply troubling the people of God. Their false teaching had shaken the conviction of true believers. They taught that the resurrection was past. This would make the believers afraid that their faith was in vain – and they would doubt their salvation. However, this did not mean that their salvation was actually taken away; but only that their peace was taken away. Their salvation rested on a foundation which can never be shaken. So we get the following verse: “Nevertheless the foundation of God standeth sure, having this seal, The Lord knoweth them that are his. And, let every one that nameth the name of Christ depart from iniquity.” Salvation is in the Lord and it can never be shaken. As far as responsibility is concerned, it is a two sided coin (seal). The Lord’s side – He knows which ones belong to Him, whether false teachers like Hymenaeus and Philetus have shaken their faith or not. Our side – since we profess to belong to Christ, we need to hold fast and walk godly in this world. Ironically, this verse – which supporters of conditional security use to support their doctrine – actually condemns those who teach Conditional Security, because their doctrine causes simple believers to doubt a fact that is eternal and true, and in a similar way they “overthrow the faith of some.”

Romans 11:18-22

“Boast not against the branches. But if thou boast, thou bearest not the root, but the root thee. Thou wilt say then, The branches were broken off, that I might be grafted in. Well; because of unbelief they were broken off, and thou standest by faith. Be not highminded, but fear: For if God spared not the natural branches, take heed lest he also spare not thee. Behold therefore the goodness and severity of God: on them which fell, severity; but toward thee, goodness, if thou continue in his goodness: otherwise thou also shalt be cut off.”
It surprised me that some use this passage to support Conditional Security because it is really a simple one, but it is necessary to see the context in Romans 9, 10, and 11. To stumble at this text demonstrates a misunderstanding of God’s purposes with regard to Israel (an area of doctrinal neglect which is the source of much of the confusion in the mainstream Christian denominations today). In Romans 9, 10, and 11 we get a profound statement about God’s dispensational purposes in dealing with Israel as a nation, and indirectly, with the Gentile nations. If we miss the meaning of these verses we have missed the clearest New Testament teaching on God’s past, present, and future dealings with Israel. If we read these chapters with our understanding enlightened, it will open up the rest of the Word of God to us.
 
Israel was the people of God. He tested man as a race by running the specimen – the nation of Israel – through a number of tests throughout most of the Old Testament. Pictured as the vineyard in Isaiah 5, they brought forth only “wild grapes”. After forsaking the Lord God of their fathers, they chased after many false gods, and wanted their independence from Jehovah. So God gave them over to their lusts, and they were taken captive, and “Then said God, Call his name Loammi: for ye are not my people, and I will not be your God” (Hosea 1:9). And so He cut off the natural Jewish branches, which had grown from birth on the tree of God’s blessing. But now the door was open to the Gentiles, and in grace those who were “in time past Gentiles in the flesh… aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers from the covenants of promise… But now in Christ Jesus ye who sometimes were far off are made nigh by the blood of Christ” (Ephesians 2:11-13). And so we read, “For I speak to you Gentiles… thou, being a wild olive tree, wert grafted in.” Now the way has been opened, after so many years, for Gentiles to come into the blessing of God.
 
The main points of Romans 9-11 are to reveal God’s righteousness in His dealings with Israel; i.e. God was not unjust to set Israel aside, and He is not unfaithful to His promises because Israel will not be cast off forever.
  • Ch. 9 – God has always acted in Sovereign Grace, but that grace does not absolve Israel from their responsibility to accept Christ.
  • Ch. 10 – Israel has broken the law and rejected the gospel. Now God turns to the Gentile and sets aside Israel.
  • Ch. 11 – Israel is not cast away forever. The Gentiles will eventually reject the grace of God, and their fall from grace will become the occasion of Israel’s restoration.

But Paul gives a warning to those Gentile “Christians” who only boast that they are “in” and the Jews as a nation are “out”; who are there in profession, but not in reality. The warning is; “Boast not against the branches… For if God spared not the natural branches, take heed lest he also spare not thee… if thou continue in his goodness: otherwise thou also shalt be cut off.” If they continued in false profession, God would cut them out of the tree of blessing in a very severe way. Remember, he as addressing the Gentiles as a class of professing Christians in these Chapters (“For I speak to you Gentiles”), and Israel as a nation.1 He is in no way saying that an individual can lose their Eternal Security; for it is a different subject altogether! Notice that what Paul warned of will come to pass in the tribulation, when the false church (largely made up of Gentile professors) is judged halfway through the tribulation, and at the end of the tribulation Israel as a nation is restored to blessing under their Messiah; “and they also, if they abide not still in unbelief, shall be grafted in: for God is able to graft them in again”.

  
God never contradicts Himself. If it seems that He is contradicting Himself, then it is we who must ask for wisdom to understand the meaning of scripture. It is only our miserable human minds that blind us from the truth. Let us speak “not in the words which man’s wisdom teacheth, but which the Holy Ghost teacheth” (1 Corinthians 2:13).

Passages from the Gospels

The key to understanding the gospels is to understand when Jesus was speaking to His disciples as the Jewish remnant, and when He was speaking in anticipation of Christianity. For instance, supporters of conditional security often apply passages from the Olivet Discourse to the gospel, not understanding the prophetic meaning of the discourse.

“But he that shall endure unto the end, the same shall be saved.” Matt. 24:13
Supporters of conditional security say this verse means that those who give up on God partway through their life will not be saved. But we can clearly see from the context that this is talking about the faithful Jewish remnant in the tribulation. It is NOT talking about members of the Church, and it is NOT talking about the time we live in. This verse is shows that in the midst of an apostate nation, the delusion of false prophets and false Christs will so strong that “if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect.” God will allow this time of purification to manifest which ones are real. All those who merely profess will take the mark of “the beast” and will worship him (Revelation 14:9). They will make a covenant with him for protection from their greatest enemies. That covenant will not be able to protect them, and they will be destroyed (Isaiah 28:15-20). We can see from the prophetic events mentioned elsewhere in the Bible how comforting to those faithful Jews will be these words from Jesus Himself; “But he that shall endure unto the end, the same shall be saved.”

Passages from the Gospel of John and John’s Epistles

Very briefly, it would be prudent to mention several passages from John’s writings that might seem to support Conditional Security. John’s style is different from the other writers; typically, he wrote in the absolute. This means that he often states black and white facts without giving reasons as Peter and Paul do. This will be evident in the next few passages quoted.
 
Also, the subject of John’s ministry is much different from Paul’s, although there is some overlap. To Paul was given the Gospel of God, the revelation of the Mystery, Church doctrine, and the purpose of God in all things, etc. But John’s ministry teaches us deeper, and more fundamental doctrines, such as the nature of God as light and love, and eternal life. We will look at two passages; one from the Gospel of John and one from John’s First Epistle.

John 15:2-6

“I am the true vine, and my Father is the husbandman. Every branch in me that beareth not fruit he taketh away: and every branch that beareth fruit, he purgeth it, that it may bring forth more fruit. Now ye are clean through the word which I have spoken unto you. Abide in me, and I in you. As the branch cannot bear fruit of itself, except it abide in the vine; no more can ye, except ye abide in me. I am the vine, ye are the branches: He that abideth in me, and I in him, the same bringeth forth much fruit: for without me ye can do nothing. If a man abide not in me, he is cast forth as a branch, and is withered; and men gather them, and cast them into the fire, and they are burned.”
Supporters of conditional security say these verses prove that security is conditional because a branch is cut off and burned. Once again, this would be a contradiction to the multitude of verses that assure us of Eternal Security. If there “seems” to be a contradiction, the problem lies not God, but with the reader. The vine was the earthly relationship between the Lord and His disciples. It is not the heavenly link of the Holy Ghost that indwells the believer. It is an earthy relationship, as was the vine is Isaiah 5 – earthly Israel – and it refers only to earthly ties of profession. The difference between this vine and the vineyard in Isaiah 5 is that this vine is the true vine. There is no need to put a hedge around it, build a tower, and hope for good fruit. The fruit will be produced where there is true communion with Christ.
 
Whether there is really life or not will be manifested by whether there is fruit or not. Those that have no life are cast forth and burned. The only way fruit can be produced is through Christ. If we are not abiding in Christ, we will not produce fruit. This passage does not infer that a believer can lose his salvation. A branch that is cut off or burned is an apostate (never saved). However, the Husbandman may purge us from time to time to help us bring forth more fruit.

1 John 3:8-9

“He that practises sin is of the devil; for from [the] beginning the devil sins. To this end the Son of God has been manifested, that he might undo the works of the devil. Whoever has been begotten of God does not practise sin, because his seed abides in him, and he cannot sin, because he has been begotten of God.”
Supporters of conditional security say these verses prove that security is conditional because if a believer practices sin, immediately they switch from being a child of God to being a child of the devil. That is not the case. Here again we have John speaking in the absolute. He is describing the family character of those who are children of God (they do not practice sin), and the family character of children of the Devil (they practice sin). John isn’t suggesting that if a true believer has a fall and commits a sin that they will lose their salvation. We know from the first chapter, verse 4, that John’s purpose in writing was to build up the children of God and to give them assurance; “And these things write we to you that your joy may be full.”
 

What is the Doctrine of Eternal Security?

The doctrine of Eternal Security is, simply put, the principle that once I am saved, I will always be saved; my eternal destiny is never in doubt. It recognizes that there was nothing that I could do to obtain my salvation (as far as works or manner of life is concerned) and there is nothing that I can do to uphold it. Two unambiguous, indisputable verses would be:

“For by one offering he hath perfected for ever them that are sanctified.” Hebrews 10:14
“My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me: And I give unto them eternal life; and they shall never perish, neither shall any man pluck them out of my hand. My Father, which gave them me, is greater than all; and no man is able to pluck them out of my Father’s hand. I and my Father are one.” John 10:27-30
These sheep will never be lost, because the Father has given them to the Son, and “all that the Father giveth me shall come to me; and him that cometh to me I will in no wise cast out” (John 6:37).
 
I would say to a supporter of Conditional Security, please consider the following verses:
John 3:16
John 5:24
John 6:37
John 10:28-29
Rom. 4:7-8
Rom. 4:25 – 5:2
Rom. 8:28-30
1 Cor. 1:8-9
1 Cor. 3:15
2 Cor. 1:21-22
Eph. 1:4-5
Eph. 1:11
Eph. 1:13-14
Heb. 7:25
Heb. 9:12-14
Heb. 10:12
Heb. 10:17-18
1 Pet. 1:3-5
1 John 2:19
1 John 3:19
1 John 5:4
 
The Epistle to the Ephesians is a book that gives the reader the eternal viewpoint on everything. If one is trying to understand which doctrine is correct (Eternal Security or Conditional Security), the Epistle to the Ephesians holds a clear answer.
“According as he hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before him in love: Having predestinated us unto the adoption of [sons] by Jesus Christ to himself, according to the good pleasure of his will, To the praise of the glory of his grace, wherein he hath made us accepted in the beloved. In whom we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of sins, according to the riches of his grace.” Ephesians 1:4-7
These verses are so clear on the subject that I do not need to write another word. Could the Holy Ghost have been clearer in revealing the Eternal Councils concerning our Eternal Security? Is there a simpler way to say, “chosen in him before the foundation of the word”? Is there a more perfect acceptance than that which is “in the Beloved”? Can one possibly think that they could be accepted in all the perfect acceptance of God’s well-beloved Son, and then by any carelessness of their own slip backward from that blessed position into unacceptability? Such a thought is not only absurd, but contradictory to these most explicit verses.
“…in whom also after that ye believed, ye were sealed with that holy Spirit of promise, Which is the earnest of our inheritance until the redemption of the purchased possession…” Ephesians 1:13-14
Not only are we “accepted in the Beloved” and have our eternal destiny secured, but God is His grace has chosen to involve us in His plans to glorify Christ in heaven and in earth (read Ephesians 1:10-12). We are going to inherit all created things with Christ, and as a down payment He has sealed us with that “holy Spirit of promise”! In indwelling Spirit is God’s own promise that we will, without a shadow of a doubt, inherit all things with Christ! What a glorious future we have promised to us!
 
At the end of chapter one, Paul prays for the Ephesians and in his prayer makes mention of how Christ was raised from the dead by the power of God, and seated in heavenly places, all things being put under his feet. Now, in chapter two he shows how God (in His grace) has applied the same pattern to us – with one difference. We were dead in our own sins. But when we were utterly dead and unresponsive to God, he has “quickened us together with Christ” and “raised us up together” and “made us sit together in heavenly places in Christ Jesus”. Next we find that we are saved by grace alone, through the gift of faith, which we could never have had on our own. Salvation is all of Him! The beauty of it all is that there is nothing we could do as dead in sins, so He gave us new life, and with it faith, through which we believed. Our salvation was not won by our own works, nor can it be upheld by them. There are good works that we can do; however, even these have been chosen for us, “unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them.”
 

Helpful Principles that Need to be Observed

The following principles will clear up, I think, the vast majority of the passages we have not mentioned heretofore:

1. Approach scripture in a “Christ-centered” way

“All scripture is profitable” (2 Timothy 3:16) and “whatsoever things were written aforetime were written for our learning” (Romans 15:4) but they were not all addressed to us directly. Note to whom the scriptures are addressed. We need to take context into consideration when we read. I am particularly thinking of the Jewish Epistles and the Gospels. God’s eternal purpose is to glorify Christ… the blessing of man is secondary to that.

2. Understand the rest of scripture in the light of the Mystery

Many Christians struggle to understand prophecy because they think the Church is the subject of prophecy… it’s not. If they would first understand the Mystery, that the Church is a brand-new institution of God formed of Jew and Gentile in one Body, they would better understand prophecy. They would not fall into the trap of Replacement Theology, which claims that the Church in the New Testament is the replacement for Israel. The Mystery shows us what God has been getting at all along; and finally – now that His heart is free to flow out in grace – God is calling out a bride for His Son.

3. God requires from man that which he can only present in full dependence on God

An example is in Hebrews 12; “holiness, without which no man shall see the Lord” – God is requiring practical external holiness (hagiasmos) which man could ever present to God without a nature of holiness (hagiosunē or hagiotes) which is only obtained as a sovereign gift from God. Following is a quotation that puts these principles into words very nicely.

“It is a great thing never to twist a single text of scripture to a doctrine. God is wiser than we are, and He has made no mistakes. I see people afraid of certain texts about certain doctrines, and I feel, therefore, that doctrine is not a settled thing with them… It is quite true, that the moment I look at a believer in Christ, there is no “if,” nor can be, as to his security; he is accepted in the Beloved, and there is no “if anything”; he is sitting in the heavenly places in Christ, and the whole matter is settled; but that is not all that God has chosen to do about him. He has chosen to put him through the wilderness when he has redeemed Him, and then we have “ifs” and “whens” without end: “If ye hold fast,” in Hebrews; “If ye continue,” in Colossians, and so on. But what we have along with it is, absolute dependence upon Another, and infallible faithfulness in Another. As I have sometimes said, I may be standing with my child on the top of a rocky precipice, and he is apt to run about foolishly, and I say to him, “If you tumble over, you will be smashed to atoms”; but I have not the slightest idea of leaving my hold of him, or of letting him fall. Now we are kept by the power of God through faith unto salvation. This shews we need to be kept; but on our side it is dependence on the power that does keep. You cannot confuse that with acceptance; but it is constant dependence upon God keeps my soul in a right state towards Him.” – J.N. Darby
Understanding this principle clears up many objections to passages in Hebrews, particularly in the third chapter where the apostle is bringing out the result of unbelief; i.e. not entering into rest.

4. God addresses man’s responsibility in order to affect his conscience

Often God addresses man’s conscience without bringing out the abstract truth of Eternal Security in the same moment. Once again I will use the verse in Hebrews 12; “holiness, without which no man shall see the Lord” – at that moment the Spirit does not bring out that a nature of holiness (hagiosunē or hagiotes) comes only by new birth – the Spirit here is addressing the conscience, and therefore is calling for practical outward holiness (hagiasmos). To a person that is truly saved, and one that has the assurance of their salvation, these verses affect our conscience. But we “know of whom we have believed”, and would never use these verses to make ourselves or another soul doubt their salvation. Another quotation from JND:

“Different states of soul need different treatment. We must give meat in due season. A passage which might help on one, might puff up another; that is a question of spiritual wisdom in dealing with souls. All that I feel anxious about is the maintenance of the positive dealing of scripture with conscience. Take that passage in Romans we referred to: “Who will render to every man according to his deeds; to them who, by patient continuance,” etc. Well, a man says, There may then be good people, and if they work good, they will get glory, and honour, and peace. But I say to him, “You are wrong entirely; there is none good but God.” There is plenty of scripture to meet such a case, but we need not weaken this sentence in Romans in order to do it. It is the necessity of God’s nature, that there must be a certain life and character in a man for him to be with God. We have a scripture that God has given that nature, and that He will keep it to the end; but the latter does not enfeeble the fact that the nature is such as it is. You must have that life and walk in that life, or you will not be in heaven. Thus we have broad dealing with conscience, and that is what we must not weaken. We have it plain enough in scripture, unmitigated and unenfeebled. Consciences want it, they are slippery enough. If I use it to weaken a person’s faith in God’s fidelity, I use it wrongly; but I want to give it all its force as it stands, while giving meat in due season. Suppose I found a person slipping into sin, and I say to him, “Well, never mind, God is faithful”; though that is abstractly true, it is not what I should use to him then, but just the opposite. Yet if God did not keep me, I know I should be soon slipping off somewhere.”
Often the Holy Spirit speaks about a soul that is positionally destined for glory, yet when that soul is practically walking in self-will, He speaks about that soul as they are “on the path to destruction.” They will never reach destruction, but they can still spend their whole life on that path. An example of this is Philippians 3:18-19, “For many walk, of whom I have told you often, and now tell you even weeping, that they are the enemies of the cross of Christ: Whose end is destruction, whose God is their belly, and whose glory is in their shame, who mind earthly things.” I have no doubt that this is speaking of unbelievers, yet that is not the subject. The subject is those that “mind earthly things” as opposed to those who “mind heavenly things”. The end of the path of the latter is glory, the end of the path of the former is destruction. The fact that I walk in that path for some time doesn’t change my eternal destiny; however, I would be on the “wrong track”. Consider Lot, his life, and his eternal destiny (i.e. his “righteous soul”).
 
Another form of language that appears repeatedly in scripture is the idea of working toward something, or working toward an end. Paul often writes about conforming his life to “the day of Jesus Christ”. Would he ever fully conform his life to the point where he would be perfect in the day of Jesus Christ? Never: yet he labored to that end. This principle clears up 2 Peter 1:10, “Wherefore the rather, brethren, give diligence to make your calling and election sure: for if ye do these things, ye shall never fall: For so an entrance shall be ministered unto you abundantly into the everlasting kingdom of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ.” The force of the text is this: to labor to conform our practical life to the calling and election that we know is true of us. It would be like me saying to my son, “Son, you are a man now… I expect you to show me that you are.” It is to practically conform one’s walk to what is positionally true of them. If we do this, Peter tells us, we will have an abundant entrance when we return with Christ in glory.

5. God uses the judgment of the wicked as a warning for true believers

“For this ye know, that no whoremonger, nor unclean person, nor covetous man, who is an idolater, hath any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and of God. Let no man deceive you with vain words: for because of these things cometh the wrath of God upon the children of disobedience.” Eph. 5:5-6
Supporters of Conditional Security claim that v.5 is written to warn the believers that they may lose their salvation if they fall into any of the categories listed in this verse. From v.6 we can tell that this is not the case, because it goes on to say that the sins listed in v.5 are the reasons for judgment of the children of disobedience (the unbelieving). The apostle’s point is that God judges the sinner for their actual sins, not merely for rejecting the gospel. Paul brings this out to show believers the seriousness of sin, not to bring into question their Eternal Security. This is a classic case where the Spirit of God uses the judgment of the wicked as a warning for true believers. Those to whom Paul was writing – those who “love our Lord Jesus Christ” – would never end up in a lost eternity. Yet it was needful to exercise their consciences by showing them the eternal consequences of these sins in “the children of disobedience”.

6. Man’s Responsibility does not negate or annul God’s Sovereignty

Man’s responsibility and God’s sovereignty are two lines of truth that run throughout scripture. Our human minds cannot comprehend how God can be absolutely sovereign, and yet He hold man responsible. Trying to reason these two things out – to make them meet together in a rational way – has led many into the error of picking one side, and explaining away the other. I fear this has not been the case with you. Two chapters that have been a great help to me in this regard have been Romans 9 (God’s Sovereignty) and Romans 10 (Man’s Responsibility). Romans 9 sets forth God’s sovereignty in every choice He has made. Romans 10 sets forth man’s failure in light of the grace of God, and how God will hold man responsible for his actions. Romans 11 shows how God can hold man responsible, and yet bless on the basis of sovereign grace.

7. Propitiation and Substitution

There is a fundamental misunderstanding concerning the work of Christ that lies at the root of conditional security. Supporters of conditional security do not hold the doctrine that Jesus Christ was the substitute on Calvary’s cross for each individual believer. They do not hold that Jesus Christ suffered for individual sins. They acknowledge that Jesus is the Savior, and that He suffered for sin, but they neither understand nor believe the doctrine of substitution. The work of Christ on the cross has two aspects: one is propitiatory, the other is substitutional.

 
The propitiatory aspect is required because of our sins, but it is the aspect of the sacrifice in which Christ has perfectly glorified and satisfied God the Father. Thus, ‘sin’ was taken care of before God. In this sense, propitiation is the grounds of God’s mercy to man. As a result of this, the gospel can go to the whole world, and anyone who comes in the value of that shed blood will be saved. The work of Christ has perfectly satisfied God, and so we have heard the gospel message; whosoever will may come. But there are also the individual ‘sins’ (plural) of all those that believe which must be accounted for. The checks and balances are perfectly kept by the righteousness of God. In order for us to stand in the presence of a holy God, our sins must be expiated. In order for God to be “just and the justifier of him that believeth in Jesus” (Romans 3:26), our sins had to be paid for, and Christ must suffer for them in the believer’s place. When scripture mentions bearing sins, the word “all” is intentionally avoided. Instead, the word “many” or “some” is used, because not “every man” will believe, and Christ could not be punished for the sins of those who believe not.
 
This balance of doctrine is lacking in many places in the Christian profession. Armenians do not see substitution – and therefore tend toward the doctrine of Conditional Security. Calvinists do not see propitiation – and therefore they see no point in preaching the gospel. Both positions are wrong. The bottom line is, those who do not hold substitution can never enjoy Eternal Security, because they deny one aspect of the work of Christ. The result? No peace.

8. God’s Sovereignty in the Impartation of Life

Another theme in the New Testament that a supporter of Conditional Security most likely does not understand is the principle of quickening. I will only go into it a little now, but if one really lays hold on this truth, all thoughts of Conditional Security will be forever put from their mind.

“He came unto his own, and his own received him not. But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name: Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God.” John 1:11-13
We find from this verse that those who believe on the name of the Lord Jesus were already born of God. In John 10 it is assumed that those who heard the Good Shepherd’s voice were already His sheep, and they showed that they belonged to Him by responding to His voice. It is so important to see that, without life from God, there would never be a response to the call of God, or the call of the Shepherd.
 
Supporters of Conditional Security believe that that work of salvation begins with a choice made by the sinner, to seek God. This idea is foolishness in light of four principles:
  1. The flesh will never produce fruit for God. “The carnal mind… is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be. So then they that are in the flesh cannot please God.” Romans 8:7-8.
  2. The flesh cannot improve itself.“That which is born of the flesh is flesh.” John 3:6
  3. The flesh cannot “invite” new birth.“Which were born… not of the will of the flesh.” John 1:13
  4. The flesh has been categorically condemned by God. “God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh.” Romans 8:3

The importance of this truth is: If you couldn’t even initiate your own salvation, how could you think that you can complete it or maintain it? Paul insists that such a premonition is foolishness in Galatians 3:2-3.

“This only would I learn of you, Received ye the Spirit by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith? Are ye so foolish? having begun in the Spirit, are ye now made perfect by the flesh?”
Why is it so hard for supporters of conditional security to admit that their salvation is due to the sovereign grace of God alone? At the root of it is the fact that the flesh wants to take “partial credit” for salvation.

9. Reality vs. Profession

Those who hold conditional security will often point to examples of “believers” who gave up Christianity as evidence that a believer can be saved and lost again. A Biblical understanding of the difference between human belief and true faith will clear that up. All through scripture we find that there are a large number who associate themselves with the name of Christ, but not all of them have a personal relationship with Him. There are the wheat and the tares (Matt. 13). The wheat are those who received the Word of God by faith, while the tares (darnel) are those who make a profession (i.e. look like real wheat), but are not genuine. We must understand that not everyone who says “Lord, Lord” will enter into heaven. Those with true faith will be gathered into the garner, and the tares will be cast into the fire.
 
It is possible, along with outward profession, to have a kind of external belief in the facts of Christianity without having true faith. An example would be the “seed that fell on shallow ground” in the parable of the sower. The seed sprung up, but it had “no depth of earth”. They “received the word with gladness”, but the Word of God did not sink down into their conscience and take root there.
 
There is such a thing as external, human belief in Jesus, but it isn’t true faith. In John 8:30 “many believed on him”, but if you keep reading, it was merely an external belief. In v.31 Jesus “said to the Jews who believed him, If ye abide in my word, ye are truly my disciples”. They had believed on Him in an external way, but they were not “disciples indeed”. The conditional “if you continue” is inserted, because whether they had true faith was not evident, and would be tested by obedience to His word. In John 3:16, “believing on the Son” is real faith, a gift from God (Eph. 2:8-9), and it is through this faith we are justified. There is no condition; he that believes shall not perish”… period. When real faith is present, there are no conditions.
 
A helpful passage is John 2:23-25, where “many believed on his name, beholding his signs which he wrought.” These were people that were impressed by Jesus’ miracles, but there was no inward work of faith in their souls. “But Jesus himself did not trust himself to them, because he knew all men, and that he had not need that any should testify of man, for himself knew what was in man.” (vv.24-25). Why didn’t Jesus commit Himself to them? He knew their hearts, that they were still in darkness. There is a great difference between human belief and real faith. For example, I see in the news that the Patriots have won the Superbowl… and I give mental assent to the fact. That is human belief, but it is different than true faith. Faith simply receives God’s testimony (John 3:33), even without evidence. 
 
Those “Christians” that once claimed to believe and later turned their back on God most likely never had the true faith of John 3:16. They only had the external belief of John 8:30 and John 2:23.

10. True Doctrine Glorifies Christ, False Doctrine Glorifies Man

The verse that I will use to support this statement is John 16:13-14. The Lord Jesus makes a statement that the Spirit of God would not speak words from Himself, but rather would show to the New Testament saints what a risen and glorified Jesus gave unto Him!

“Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak: and he will show you things to come. He shall glorify me: for he shall receive of mine, and shall show it unto you.”
The simple fact is, every true doctrine will have the effect of glorifying Christ. This is a simple litmus test that we can perform on every teaching we are presented with. I have never seen this test fail. Let me provide several examples:
 
Doctrine Glorifies Christ? Glorifies Man? Determination
Jesus Christ could have sinned. No. Denies that Jesus has a sinless holy nature. Yes. Makes man seem closer to Jesus… makes man seem not quite as bad. False doctrine.
Man has a free will. No. Among other things, it sets aside Christ’s glory as a quickening Spirit, giving life to lost souls. Yes. Says that man was not totally depraved. There was something in man that reached out for God. False doctrine.
Christ was not raised from the dead. No. Makes Christ a liar, denies His sinless perfection, denies the completion of the atoning work, etc. Yes. If God never gave His approval for the work of Christ, then lost man wasn’t bad enough to need it. False doctrine.
Jesus was 100% human and 100% divine. Yes. Gives him manhood glories as the one man God could take pleasure in. Made Him able to be sympathetic, etc. At the same time maintains His Godhead glories. No. Shows how wicked the race of man is in contrast to the Perfect man. Establishes man’s guilt because we rejected God Himself in flesh. True doctrine.
 Apply this test to Conditional and Eternal Security:
Conditional Security No. Says the atoning work was NOT enough. Yes. Takes partial credit for salvation. False doctrine.
Eternal Security Yes. Gives Christ ALL the credit for my salvation. No. Says that man could do nothing to earn his salvation. True doctrine.
 
The conclusion is simple, but solemn. Conditional Security does not glorify Christ, and is a false doctrine.
 

The Great Result of the Doctrine of Conditional Security

The doctrine of Conditional Security ultimately states that salvation is upheld, in some measure, by human efforts. We might witness the following dialogue between supporters of the opposing positions (E.S. for a supporter of Eternal Security and C.S. for a supporter of Conditional Security):

E.S.  “What is the basis of your salvation? On what grounds do you expect to escape the wrath of God?”
 
C.S.  “On the basis of the work of Christ.” (sounds pretty good so far…)
 
E.S.  “Is that all that is involved in being saved?”
 
C.S.  “Well, the work of Christ only would apply to those who ‘endure to the end’ and never slip into a state of lukewarmness. Still, I believe salvation is based on the work of Christ; without it, no one would be saved.”
 
E.S.  “Do you mean to say that salvation is dependent on how one conducts their life, in some measure at least?”
 
C.S.  “Well, yes I do. If one gives up the faith they have ‘made shipwreck concerning the faith’ and the work of Christ no longer applies to them and they are no longer saved.”
 
E.S.  “Let us get this straight – you believe that salvation is upheld by your own works, in some measure at least?”
 
C.S.  “Yes. Salvation is… well… indirectly dependent on works.”
In essence, the doctrine of Conditional Security undermines the truth of the gospel. We will show this by examining the Epistle to the Romans, in which the doctrine of the gospel is very simply laid out.
 
In the first three chapters of Romans, Paul systematically proves beyond the shadow of a doubt that all men are sinners by nature and by practice; “for we have before proved both Jews and Gentiles, that they are all under sin; As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one”. The apostle continues to explain about the righteousness of God: “Even the righteousness of God which is by faith of Jesus Christ unto all and upon all them that believe”. While man has been unrighteous, God has been perfectly righteous. In His righteousness, He has contrived a plan to save rebellious man. That plan of salvation is offered to all, and it is effectual upon those who believe. In chapter 4, we have more details; namely, how God reckons a sinner as righteous. God looks at those that believe and marks them off as righteous. Why do we need to be marked as righteous? “…for there is no difference: For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God.” If we are all sinners (all the world has become guilty before Him) then how can we be justified before God? It is only by His grace: “Being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus…”
 
Finally, God’s purpose in the work of Christ is brought out: “Whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood, to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past, through the forbearance of God.” In other words, the gospel explains the way in which a righteous God could overlook the sins of Old Testament believers such as David, Abraham, and Noah. But this is not only for those who lived before the cross, but to those of us on the New Testament side of the cross: “To declare, I say, at this time his righteousness: that he might be just, and the justifier of him which believeth in Jesus.” That is, how God can justify sinners, and still remain consistent Himself. The Righteousness of God is not the perfect life of Christ. Rather, it is the fact that God can save lost sinners, and yet still remain righteous. His righteousness is shown out or “revealed” (Rom. 1:17) through the Gospel.
 
The doctrine of the gospel shows how that a man that lives his whole life as a thief or a murder can repent in faith in his last moments on earth, be counted righteousness, and thus be justified before God. How would he be justified? “Being now justified by his blood”. If he was justified, the work was accomplished by Christ on the cross through the shedding of His blood “who was delivered for our offences, and was raised again for our justification.”
 
To say that justification is obtained or upheld by anything other than the finished work of Christ on Calvary’s cross, would be to openly contradict the truth of the gospel, and to teach false doctrine in its most basic form.
 
Where I feel that this doctrine of Conditional Security has landed many poor Christians is: off of the ground of complete resting in the work of Christ, and onto the ground of their own works. A Christian who holds Conditional Security is a person who is trying to complete an already finished work.
 
They might talk about “brokenness” all day long, and how “broken” they are; yet to the spiritual man this is merely the boasting of one trying to convince themselves of their current standing with God. What saith the scripture? “Where is boasting then? It is excluded. By what law? of works? Nay: but by the law of faith.” They are essentially in the position of the Galatians: one that was “born free” yet by some measure of fleshly religion having put themselves back under the law. What that individual is really saying is that the work of Christ is not enough: “for if righteousness come by the law, then Christ has died for nothing.”
“O foolish Galatians, who hath bewitched you, that ye should not obey the truth, before whose eyes Jesus Christ hath been evidently set forth, crucified among you? This only would I learn of you, Received ye the Spirit by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith? Are ye so foolish? having begun in the Spirit, are ye now made perfect by the flesh?” Galatians 3:1-3
How can one possibly think that being saved initially by faith in Christ alone that now they can uphold their salvation by works? Such a thought, Paul says, is foolishness – they have been “bewitched”.
“Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free, and be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage. Behold, I Paul say unto you, that if ye be circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing. For I testify again to every man that is circumcised, that he is a debtor to do the whole law. Christ is become of no effect unto you, whosoever of you are justified by the law; ye are fallen from grace. For we through the Spirit wait for the hope of righteousness by faith. For in Jesus Christ neither circumcision availeth any thing, nor uncircumcision; but faith which worketh by love. Ye did run well; who did hinder you that ye should not obey the truth? This persuasion cometh not of him that calleth you.” Galatians 5:1-8
The key principle to draw from this passage is in the statement: “For I testify again to every man that is circumcised, that he is a debtor to do the whole law.” If you try to do any part of the law – even the ceremonial parts, you become responsible to keep all the law – including the moral parts, because you are leaving the principle of grace. You are either resting on grace alone or the works of the law alone: there is no middle ground! People talk about polarizing an argument, and how it is not fair to formalize two moral poles in a debate setting, yet that is what the Holy Ghost (by inspiration through the Apostle Paul) does here! You are living by either the principle of grace alone, or works. Trying to mix the principles of grace and works will only result in the principle of works – a fact which Paul has stated and which we have proved heretofore. The result is a slight against the work of Christ, and you have fallen from that wonderful position which you could be enjoying: “Christ is become of no effect unto you, whosoever of you are justified by the law; ye are fallen from grace.”
 
 
 

Conclusion

We need to “Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free, and be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage.” Our flesh is always looking for something to do – whether it be to gain or uphold salvation – but the only way to have true liberty is to rest completely on the finished work of Christ and His sovereign grace.

 
If I have “fallen from grace” and “Christ has become of no effect” to me, then my relationship with Him is far removed from what it should be. If I hold Conditional Security, then:
  • I am standing in doubt of an everlasting relationship that was predestined before the foundation of the world, made good at the cross of Calvary.
  • I doubt the faithfulness of God who says that His sheep “will never perish”.
  • I hold that God can take away the Holy Spirit from a believer, though God says they are “sealed until the day of redemption”.
  • I have slighted the work of Christ, inasmuch as I have declared the work was NOT finished, because it alone cannot save me.

What can we conclude? Supporters of conditional security do not hold or understand substitution; therefore, they do not believe that their individual sins were borne by the Lord Jesus Christ. How can you know Jesus as your personal Savior, if His work for you wasn’t personal? Conditional Security is fundamentally opposed to the doctrine of the gospel, and indirectly attributes man’s salvation to his own good works. Lastly, supporters of conditional security have fallen from grace, and are constrained by the fear of judgment rather than the love of Christ.

Footnotes

  1. This is quite clear. Paul speaks about Israel as the natural branches and the Gentiles as the wild. Were all the natural branches real believers? Of course not – we have Old Testament accounts of those who were entirely false, yet they were classed with Israel. So it is with the wild branches. Again, he is not speaking of individual reality, but a class of profession.

Can you provide comments, suggestions, or corrections?